The Synoptic Gospels & Acts

 


Andy's Note Cards: Acts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Introduction
The Acts of the Apostles #44
New Jerome Biblical Commentary

NOTE CARDS

Andy Syring

  • Identity and Credentials of the Author
  • Author of Acts is not found in the text – an anonymous book
    • Earliest attributing of Acts to Luke
      • The Antiochene and companion of Paul
      • 2nd century
    • Authorship of Luke-Acts dedicated to Theophilus not contested
    • One school (English) insists on full factual basis of “we” passages
      • The book’s author appears to take position among Paul’s companions on sporadic missionary journeys
    • The other school (German)  
      • Emphasizes differences between Acts portrait of Paul and apostle’s firsthand testimonies
    • The value of Acts doesn’t hang on these positions
      • Many consider the canonical authority to be inadmissibly compromised by denial of credentials as a witness of Paul
    • Difficult to process evidence submitted on either side
      • Those who deny Luke’s personal connection with Paul cannot agree on “we” passages come from intermittent source or literary technique
      • Those who maintain that it was Paul’s companion who wrote the book and expressed himself in the “we”
        • Tend to make light of unfamiliar features of Lucan Paul
        • Urges Luke’s limited participation in his journey’s
    • Writer’s opinion distinguishing traits of Luke’s Paul not assisted by the view that a companion of the apostle wrote Acts.
      • This does not mean
        • That one cannot minimize the difficulties of explaining “we”
          • “We” most likely a stylistic device rather than a signal
        • Or that one becomes programmatically committed to accentuating the Luke-Paul discordances while underplaying their harmonies.
          • The hypothesis that the “we” is Luke’s own certifying device does not compromise the historical value of accounts in that form
    • Immense Importance accorded Paul in Acts history suggests it composition in a community of the Pauline mission ambit
      • Exact location of this community is guesswork
        • Dating parameters would include Gospel of Luke compostion well after 70 AD
        • Probable circulation of the letter corpus circa AD 80
        • Thus dating Acts between AD 80 and 90   
  • Literary From and Purpose
  • Why Luke produced Acts and what did this two volume combination mean to accomplish
    • Closely related to the vexed problem of literary genre of the books
  • Literary Genre
    • Some insist that Acts created a new literary form
    • Where genre question has been pursued redounded to the separation of the two volumes
      • Showing that purpose of Gospel is self evident
      • Purpose of Acts needed to be explained
    • Author is interested in the progress of the word of salvation
    • Numerous attempts have been made to classify Acts but end up ignoring the fact repeatedly demonstrated by the text.
  • Popular Approach involves two firm principles
    • That their literary relationship shows Luke and Acts to constitute “a historical and literary unity”
    • That the most reliable clues to the character and purpose of his work are offered by Luke’s unique prologues
      • Judging by his prologues, Luke intended to write history in an unexceptionable procedure
  • “Historical Monograph”
    • The distinguishing feature is the exposition of the driving forces through key episodes in a reduced narrative framework
    • Both Lucan volumes argue the author’s view of salvation history, embracing the epochs of promise of fulfillment
  • Continuity of salvation history through its central crossroads – principle arguments of Luke-Acts
    • The life of Jesus
    • The birth of the new Church
    • Luke not concerned to explain reasons for the failure of the Jews to embrace the gospel, “but to encounter the real theological difficulty that such a failure presented to Christians” 
  • Tradition and Composition
  • Luke used historiography practiced by others contemporaries
    • It involved the compositional stratagems of inserted speeches, letters, generalizing summaries, mimicry of classical discourse patterns, “dramatic-episode” texture of presentation
  • A. Dramatic-Episode Style
    • Author concentrates on historical reality before the eyes on paradigmatic events
      • Ignores the chronological sequence
    • Some think this method makes Luke look like a storyteller rather than a historian
    • Method not peculiar but stands in a broad tradition of Hellenistic historiography which did not sacrifice the truth to “edification”
    • Clearest example of dramatic-episodes
      • Pentecost (chapter 2)
      • Stephen’s martyrdom (chapters 6-7)
      • The Conrnelius Conversion (chapter 10)
      • The Jerusalem agreement (chapter 15)
      • Paul’s Ahtens mission (17:16-34)
      • Successive trials (chapters 21-26)
    • Each is shaped like a vehicle for an important theorem of Luke’s theology of history.  
  • B. Speeches
    • Centerpiece of most of the scenes is a speech whether a:
      • A sermon (chapters 2, 17)
      • A prophetic indictment (chapter 7)
      • A didactic commentary on the event at hand (chapters 10, 15)
      • An apologia before public authority (chapters 22, 26)
    • Popularity of speeches as historiographcial devices is well documented in Hellenistic literature
    • Speeches are to be understood less from the historical situation than from the context of the book as a whole
    • Luke is author of all speeches in Acts
    • Missionary discourses – thought by Dibelius to limit his Hellenistic analogy
      • Six missionary discourses to Jewish audiences
      • Two missionary discourses to Gentiles
        • Content is held within the traditional contours of early Christianity kerygma
          • This accounts for the repetitive feature of these passages
          • Does not make tracing their precise traditional background an easy exercise
      • Others consider the schema a product of Luke’s design for his own argumentative purposes
      • Mission sermons are not really an exception to the Hellenistic analogy
        • They do not preach the gospel directly but illustrate how the apostolic preaching and its reception is carried the outcome intended by God 
  • C. Mimesis
    • Speeches to Jews have been taken as pointers to older tradition
    • Speeches also pertain to writing techniques practiced by postclassical culture
    • Example of Mimetic Procedure distinctive to Luke
      • The section of Acts when dealing with the mission under the twelve the model is the LXX (Septuagint Greek Bible)
      • No formal quotation but his adaptation of their style and idiom for his own writing
  • D. Summaries
    • Used to fill gaps between freestanding episodes
      • This is also seen in Mark’s composition
    • Generalizes single incidents and circumstances of the narrated episodes
    • Major summaries occur in first five chapters
      • Where Luke’s information was probably most fragmentary
    • Minor summaries, usually a single verse appear throughout text
      • Not mere stopgap devices
      • Important compositional stratagems for sustaining argument concerning the history he is telling
      • Idealize the period of apostle’s ministry in Jerusalem
      • Sustain the reader’s impression of a steady growth of the Christian movement plotted by the will of God 
  • E. The Sources of Acts
    • Stylistic criteria along will not trace continuous source because author rewrites his sources
    • Not a continuous source basis for the first half of Acts
      • Except “Antiocene” source underlying ch.6-15 has been exhumed
      • After chapter 15 there is better footing for source analysis
      • M. Dibelius formulated a double hypothesis of “itinerary”
        • A travel diary written by a companion of Paul
      • Paul- letters give analytical support to pre-Lucan documentation 
  • The Greek Text of Acts
  • Acts is unique because it was transmitted form early on in two text types - neither of which con be consistently derived from the other
    • Western”
    • 1/10 longer than the Egyptian text
    • “Egyptian” (Alexandrian)
      • Purest form in the Codex Vaticanus
      • This text is favored in 20th century scholarship
        • Because it is closer to Luke’s autograph
        • And because lengthened “Western” text has its occasional omissions that betray tendencies of conscious revision
          • Such alterations an uninhibited glossing to enrich religious expressions
          • To clarify wording or situations
          • To smooth out inconsistencies or anomalies
          • To “update” the text to suit present practices and perceptions
      • These tendencies show an unconstraint in rewriting the text and thus points to a period before the learned recensions, when the scribe “did not yet consider Acts to be ‘holy writ’ which no one was allowed to alter” 
  • Outline
  • Introduction to the Era of the Church (1:1-26)
    • Witness’ Commission and Jesus’ Ascension (1:1-14)
      • Proemium (1:1-8)
      • The Ascension (1:9-14)
    • The Restoration of the Twelve (1:15-26) 
  • The Mission in Jerusalem (2:1-5:42)
    • The Appeal to Israel (2:1-3:26)
      • The Pentecost Event (2:1-13)
      • The Pentecost Sermon (2:14-41)
      • First Major Summary (2:42-47)
      • The Healing in the Temple (3:1-11)
      • Peter’s Temple Sermon (3:12-26)
    • The Life and Trials of the Apostolic Church (4:1-5:42)
      • Peter and John before the Sanhedrin (4:1-22)
      • The Apostle’s Prayer (4:23-31)
      • Second Major Summary (4:32-35)
      • Singular Cases (4:36-5:11)
      • Third Major Summary (5:12-16)
      • The Second Persecution (5:17-42)
  • The Mission’s Outward Path from Jerusalem (6:1-15:35)
    • The Hellenists and Their Message (6:1-8:40)
      • The Commission of the Seven (6:1-7)
      • The Testimony of Stephen (6:8-8:3)
        • Mission and trial (6:8-7:1)
        • The speech of Stephen (7:2-53)
        • The martyrdom of Stephen (7:54-8:3)
      • Philip and the Advance of the Word (8:4-40)
        • The gospel’s triumph in Samaria (8:4-25)
        • Philip and the Ethiopian eunuch (8:26-40)
    • The Persecutor Becomes the Persecuted (9:1-31)
      • The conversion of Saul (9:1-19a)
      • Saul’s Preaching and Peril in Damascus (9:19b-25)
      • Saul’s Confrontations in Jerusalem (9:26-31)
    • Peter as Missionary (9:32-11:18)
      • Miracles in Lydda and Joppa (9:32-43)
      • The Conversion of Cornelius and His Household (10:1-11:18)
        • The vision of Cornelius (10:1-8)
        • The vision of Peter (10:9-16)
        • Reception of the messengers (10:17-23a)
        • Proceedings in Cornelius’s house (10:23b-48)
        • Peter’s accounting at Jerusalem (11:1-18)
    • Between Jerusalem and Antioch (11:19-12:25)
      • The First Church of the Gentile Mission (11:19-30)
      • Herod’s Persecution and Peter’s Escape (12:1-25)
    • The First Missionary Journey of Paul (13:1-14:28)
      • Prelude to the Journey (13:1-3)
      • A Contest Won by Paul in Cyprus (13:4-12)
      • Mission and Rejection at Pisidian Antioch (13:13-52)
        • Mise-en-scene and sermon (13:13-43)
        • Beleaguered missionaries turn to the Gentiles (13:44-52)
      • Mixed Receptions in Central Asia Minor (14:1-20)
        • Iconium (14:1-7)
        • Lystra and Derbe (14:8-20)
      • Return to Antioch (14:21-28)
    • The Jerusalem Conference and Resolution (15:1-35)
      • Prehistory (15:1-5)
      • Peter’s Appeal to Precedent (15:6-12)
      • James’ Confirmation and Amendments (15:13-21)
      • Resolution (15:22-29)
      • Aftermath (15:30-35) 
  • Paul’s Path to Rome (15:36-28:31)
    • The Major Missions of Paul (15:36-20:38)
      • Missions Journeys Resumed (15:36-41)
      • The Road to Europe (16:1-10)
        • Timothy’s circumcision (16:1-5)
        • Paul’s vision (16:6-10)
      • The Mission in Greece (16:11-18:17)
        • The evangelization of Philippi (16:11-40)
        • Paul in Thessalonica and Beroea (17:1-15)
        • Paul in Athens (17:16-34)
        • Paul in Corinth (18:1-17)
      • Return to Antioch and Journeys Resumed (18:18-23)
      • The Mission in Ephesus (18:24-19:40)
        • The ministry of Apollos (18:24-28)
        • Paul and the Baptist’s disciples (19:1-7)
        • Paul’s mighty word and wonders in Ephesus (19:8-20)
        • The silversmiths’ riot and Paul’s departure (19:21-40)
      • Final Travels between Asia and Greece (20:1-16)
        • To Greece and back to Troas (20:1-6)
        • Eutychus resurrected (20:7-12)   
        • Troas to Miletus (20:13-16)
      • Paul’s Farewell to His Missions (20:17-38)
    • Paul as Prisoner and Defendant in Palestine (21:1-26:32)
      • The return to Caesarea (21:1-14)
      • Paul’s Imprisonment and Testimony in Jerusalem (21:15-23:11)
        • Paul’s reception by the church (21:15-26)
        • Riot and imprisonment (21:27-36)
        • Paul’s defense and appeal to Roman law (21:37-22:29)
        • Paul before the Sanhedrin (22:30-23:11)
      • Paul before the Governor and King at Caesarea (23:12-26:32)
        • Transfer to Caesarea (23:12-35)
        • The governor’s hearing (24:1-23)
        • Paul’s confinement at Caesarea (24:24-27)
        • Appeal to Caesar (25:1-12)
        • Festus informs King Agrippa II (25:13-22)
        • Paul before King Agrippa (25:23-26:32)
    • Paul’s Last Journey and Ministry in Rome (27:1-28:31)
      • The Journey to Rome (27:1-28:16)
        • Sea voyage, shipwreck, and deliverance (27:1-44)
        • Paul on Malta (28:1-10)
        • Paul’s arrival in Rome (28:11-16)
      • Paul in Rome (28:17-31)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

© 2008 Andy Syring. All Rights Reserved. No material found on this website may be used without the permission of its author.